IRS Discloses Tax Data to Immigration Enforcement
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is facing mounting legal challenges after it was revealed that the agency improperly shared confidential tax information of approximately 1.28 million individuals with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for use in immigration enforcement operations.
IRS Chief Risk Officer Dottie Romo confirmed the disclosure in a February 12, 2026 court declaration, stating that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had submitted formal requests for the names and addresses of 1.28 million individuals held in IRS tax records.
What Was Disclosed
| Data Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Records Shared | 1.28 million individuals |
| Data Types | Names, physical addresses from tax filings |
| Requesting Agency | ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) |
| Disclosed By | IRS, confirmed by Chief Risk Officer Dottie Romo |
| Disclosure Date | Confirmed February 12, 2026 |
| Legal Basis Claimed | Executive agreement between Treasury and DHS |
Scope of the Data
The disclosed records reportedly include information drawn from Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) filings. ITINs are issued by the IRS to individuals who are required to file taxes but do not qualify for a Social Security Number, a category that includes many undocumented immigrants and foreign nationals.
- ITIN filers — Individuals without Social Security Numbers who file taxes using ITINs
- Associated household members — Names and addresses linked to joint filings
- Historical records — Data spanning multiple tax years
Legal Challenges
ACLU Lawsuit
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a federal lawsuit challenging the legality of the data sharing arrangement, arguing that it violates:
- Internal Revenue Code Section 6103 — Federal law strictly limiting the disclosure of tax return information, with narrow exceptions that do not include immigration enforcement
- Fourth Amendment protections — Warrantless bulk sharing of personal data constitutes an unreasonable search
- Due process rights — Individuals whose data was shared were not notified or given an opportunity to challenge the disclosure
Key Legal Questions
| Issue | Argument |
|---|---|
| Statutory Authority | Section 6103 does not authorize tax data sharing for immigration enforcement |
| Executive Overreach | Executive agreements cannot override statutory privacy protections |
| Chilling Effect | Fear of data sharing deters ITIN filers from complying with tax obligations |
| Precedent | Could open the door to broader cross-agency data sharing without Congressional authorization |
Privacy and Civil Liberties Implications
Erosion of Taxpayer Trust
Tax compliance in the United States relies heavily on the principle that tax filings are confidential. If taxpayers believe their information may be used against them for non-tax purposes, compliance rates could decline significantly.
- ITIN filing rates may drop as individuals fear immigration consequences
- Tax revenue losses could follow reduced voluntary compliance
- Broader distrust of government data collection may extend beyond immigrant communities
Chilling Effect on Immigrant Communities
Privacy advocates warn that the disclosure creates a chilling effect that extends well beyond the 1.28 million directly affected individuals:
- Immigrant families may avoid filing taxes entirely
- Communities may become distrustful of government services broadly
- Workers may shift to cash-only arrangements, reducing economic transparency
- Mixed-status families face particular vulnerability, as a single filing can expose multiple household members
Historical Context
Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code was enacted in 1976 specifically to prevent the kind of cross-agency data sharing that occurred during the Nixon administration, when the IRS was weaponized against political opponents. The statute has been considered one of the strongest privacy protections in federal law for nearly five decades.
Prior to this disclosure, the IRS had consistently maintained that tax return data could not be shared with other agencies except under narrowly defined circumstances such as criminal tax investigations or specific Congressional requests.
What Happens Next
- Federal court hearings on the ACLU lawsuit are expected in the coming weeks
- Congressional oversight committees have requested briefings from both Treasury and DHS
- Privacy advocacy groups are calling for an immediate halt to all data sharing pending judicial review
- The outcome could set precedent for cross-agency data sharing involving other sensitive government records