Skip to main content
COSMICBYTEZLABS
NewsSecurityHOWTOsToolsTraining
StudyProjectsNewsletterHire MeAbout
Subscribe

Press Enter to search or Esc to close

News
Security
HOWTOs
Tools
Training
Study
Projects
Newsletter
Hire Me
About
RSS Feed
Reading List
Subscribe

Stay in the Loop

Get the latest security alerts, tutorials, and tech insights delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe NowFree forever. No spam.
COSMICBYTEZLABS

Your trusted source for IT intelligence, cybersecurity insights, and hands-on technical guides.

1577+ Articles
153+ Guides

CONTENT

  • Latest News
  • Security Alerts
  • HOWTOs
  • Checklists
  • Projects
  • Exam Prep

RESOURCES

  • Search
  • Browse Tags
  • Newsletter Archive
  • Reading List
  • RSS Feed

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 CosmicBytez Labs. All rights reserved.

System Status: Operational
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. 29-Year-Old Squid Proxy Bug 'Squidbleed' Can Leak Cleartext HTTP Requests
29-Year-Old Squid Proxy Bug 'Squidbleed' Can Leak Cleartext HTTP Requests
NEWS

29-Year-Old Squid Proxy Bug 'Squidbleed' Can Leak Cleartext HTTP Requests

A heap over-read vulnerability introduced in a 1997 FTP parser change allows a malicious co-user of a shared Squid proxy to read other users' cleartext HTTP requests, including authorization headers and session tokens.

Dylan H.

News Desk

June 23, 2026
4 min read

Researchers at Calif.io have disclosed a heap over-read vulnerability in Squid — the widely deployed open-source web proxy caching software — that can expose another user's cleartext HTTP request contents, including authentication headers and session tokens, to anyone sharing the same proxy instance. Dubbed "Squidbleed" and tracked as CVE-2026-47729, the flaw traces its origin to a single FTP-parsing code change made in 1997, meaning it has existed in default Squid configurations for nearly 29 years.

The Root Cause: A 1997 FTP Parser Bug

The vulnerability lives in Squid's FTP directory-listing parser. The specific trigger is deceptively simple:

  1. An attacker-controlled FTP server sends a directory listing line that terminates after the timestamp field with no filename present
  2. Squid's parser advances a pointer to the null terminator at the end of that line
  3. A subsequent call to strchr() on the null terminator returns a pointer instead of NULL — a subtle but critical behavioral difference
  4. A whitespace-skipping loop that depends on this return value never terminates, causing the pointer to walk beyond the buffer boundary into adjacent heap memory

The result is a classic heap over-read. Because Squid reuses freed 4KB memory buffers without zeroing them, those buffers retain the contents of recently freed HTTP request data from other connections sharing the proxy. The out-of-bounds read bleeds this stale data — including Authorization headers, session tokens, and cookies — back to the attacker.

The parallels to Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) are intentional; the Squidbleed nickname reflects the same class of vulnerability: a heap over-read that exposes sensitive data from adjacent memory belonging to other users.

Attack Requirements

Squidbleed is not an internet-wide exploitation risk. The attack scenario requires several conditions to be met simultaneously:

RequirementDetail
Proxy accessAttacker must be a permitted user of the same Squid instance
FTP server controlAttacker must operate an FTP server reachable on port 21
Victim trafficVictim must be sending cleartext HTTP traffic through the proxy
Shared instanceBoth attacker and victim must be using the same proxy

HTTPS connections are not vulnerable — they traverse Squid as opaque tunnels and their contents are never parsed.

This threat model is most relevant in corporate and enterprise proxy environments where many users share a centralized Squid instance. A semi-trusted insider or a compromised user account with proxy access would meet the conditions for exploitation.

What Can Be Leaked

When the conditions are met, the over-read exposes the raw contents of recently-freed HTTP request buffers — which can include:

  • HTTP Authorization headers (Basic auth credentials in cleartext)
  • Session tokens and cookies
  • Request URLs and parameters
  • Any other cleartext HTTP header or body data

In environments where legacy internal systems still use Basic authentication over HTTP, the exposure can be severe — credentials transmitted in cleartext by one user could be recovered by another sharing the same proxy.

CVE Details

FieldValue
CVECVE-2026-47729
NicknameSquidbleed
CVSS Score6.5 (Moderate) — SUSE
ImpactConfidentiality only
Integrity / AvailabilityNo impact
Affected versionsAll versions prior to Squid 7.7

Remediation

Two paths are available:

1. Upgrade to Squid 7.7

The fix is a null-terminator check inserted before the vulnerable strchr() calls in the FTP directory listing parser. Administrators running affected versions should upgrade to Squid 7.7, which contains the patch.

2. Disable FTP Proxying (Preferred)

Calif.io recommends disabling FTP proxying entirely as the better long-term remediation. Chromium dropped native FTP support years ago, and modern networks carry virtually no FTP traffic. Eliminating the FTP proxy feature removes the attack surface with negligible operational impact for the vast majority of organizations.

Context: Legacy Code Longevity in Critical Infrastructure

Squidbleed is another data point in a growing pattern: security-critical bugs introduced by subtle edge cases in legacy parsing code that survive for decades because the vulnerable code path is rarely exercised in normal operation. The 1997 FTP change was correct enough to not trigger any observed failures across nearly three decades of production use — only a specifically crafted edge case with a trailing-null FTP listing would expose it.

Organizations running Squid in enterprise proxy configurations should treat this as a prompt to audit their FTP proxy settings, upgrade to a patched version, and review whether any users with proxy access could reasonably be considered adversarial — a threat model that becomes more important in environments with contractor access, BYOD policies, or geographically distributed user bases.

#vulnerability#squid-proxy#cve#memory-disclosure#enterprise-security#patch

Related Articles

Data Exposure Flaws in Dify AI Platform Put 1 Million+ App Tenants at Risk

Security researchers discovered multi-tenant isolation failures in the Dify AI platform that allowed attackers to read private conversations from other tenants, preview their uploaded documents, and reach internal APIs — threatening the privacy of over one million applications built on the platform.

5 min read

Eight-Year-Old Samsung KNOX Flaw Exposed Millions of Galaxy Devices to Kernel Attacks

A high-severity use-after-free vulnerability lurking in Samsung's KNOX security framework for eight years left Galaxy devices from the S9 through S25 series vulnerable to kernel-level attacks. The flaw has now been patched, but its longevity raises serious questions about security review processes in flagship device platforms.

6 min read

FortiBleed Attackers Turn Firewalls Into Credential Stealers as Heists Persist

The FortiBleed campaign's operators weaponize Fortinet's own built-in diagnostic command to run a custom Golang sniffer that intercepts 24 authentication protocols — turning compromised FortiGate devices into self-sustaining credential harvesting platforms feeding 650+ parallel pipelines.

5 min read
Back to all News