NEWS

Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Tiffany Fined $25 Million Over

South Korea's data protection authority has fined three LVMH luxury brands a combined $25 million for data breaches affecting millions of customers, with...

Dylan H.

News Desk

February 12, 2026
3 min read
Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Tiffany Fined $25 Million Over

South Korea Fines Three LVMH Brands $25 Million

South Korea's Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) has imposed a combined $25 million in fines on three luxury brands owned by LVMH — Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior, and Tiffany & Co. — for data breaches that collectively exposed the personal information of over 5.5 million customers. All three brands were using Salesforce cloud CRM at the time of their respective incidents.


Fine Breakdown

BrandFine AmountAttack TypeCustomers Affected
Louis Vuitton$14.8 millionMalware-infected employee device3.6 million
Christian Dior~$8.5 millionPhishing attack1.95 million
Tiffany & Co.~$1.7 millionVoice phishing (vishing)4,600
Combined Total$25 million—~5.55 million

Louis Vuitton: $14.8 Million Fine

An employee's device was compromised with information-stealing malware that captured login credentials for internal systems. Attackers used the stolen credentials to access the Salesforce CRM containing 3.6 million South Korean customer records including names, purchase history, loyalty data, and contact information.

The PIPC cited failure to implement adequate endpoint security, lack of MFA for CRM access, and delayed breach detection.


Christian Dior: ~$8.5 Million Fine

Employees received sophisticated phishing emails impersonating internal communications. Multiple employees entered credentials on fake login pages, granting attackers access to the Salesforce CRM with 1.95 million customer records.


Tiffany & Co.: ~$1.7 Million Fine

Attackers called Tiffany employees posing as IT support, extracting system login credentials over the phone. This granted access to 4,600 customer records including high-value jewelry transaction data.


The Salesforce CRM Connection

While Salesforce itself was not breached, the brands failed to properly secure their Salesforce environments:

Security GapImpact
Weak authenticationSingle-factor login allowed credential-based attacks
No IP restrictionsCRM accessible from any location
Insufficient monitoringUnauthorized access went undetected
Over-permissioned accountsEmployees had excessive data access

Key Takeaway

All three breaches stemmed from human-factor attacks (malware, phishing, and vishing), underscoring that even the most prestigious global brands remain vulnerable to social engineering. The enforcement action sends a clear message that employee security awareness and proper cloud security configuration are regulatory requirements, not optional.


Sources